<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urgent note - Default assessment letters being sent to non-lodgers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quinns.com.au/blog/2011/12/21/urgent-note-default-assessment-letters-being-sent-to-non-lodgers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quinns.com.au/blog/2011/12/21/urgent-note-default-assessment-letters-being-sent-to-non-lodgers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Default assessments for non-lodgers to issue soon : : The Quinn Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.quinns.com.au/blog/2011/12/21/urgent-note-default-assessment-letters-being-sent-to-non-lodgers/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Default assessments for non-lodgers to issue soon : : The Quinn Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quinns.com.au/blog/?p=1651#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>[...] warning&#8217;. If the overdue returns were not lodged by 3 February 2012, the ATO will issue default assessments for these taxpayers based on the estimated taxable income included in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warning&#8217;. If the overdue returns were not lodged by 3 February 2012, the ATO will issue default assessments for these taxpayers based on the estimated taxable income included in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john lansell</title>
		<link>http://www.quinns.com.au/blog/2011/12/21/urgent-note-default-assessment-letters-being-sent-to-non-lodgers/comment-page-1/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>john lansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quinns.com.au/blog/?p=1651#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>G'day
When I was in the joint, I remember prosecuting a well known "racing" solicitor for non lodgement.

When I raised the section 167 assessment, he decided to lodge. I knew of this chaps "antics'' and his assets by our several dinners and long lunches.  I asked him why he was going to lodge as it might be in his interests to let the default assessment stand.  No, he demanded to lodge and so he did.

This resulted in a debit amendment and more than doubled his taxable income for the year. We, the Tax  office, knew nothing about this other income and in all probability would never have known. From memory, this happened again in the following year.
J

J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day<br />
When I was in the joint, I remember prosecuting a well known &#8220;racing&#8221; solicitor for non lodgement.</p>
<p>When I raised the section 167 assessment, he decided to lodge. I knew of this chaps &#8220;antics&#8221; and his assets by our several dinners and long lunches.  I asked him why he was going to lodge as it might be in his interests to let the default assessment stand.  No, he demanded to lodge and so he did.</p>
<p>This resulted in a debit amendment and more than doubled his taxable income for the year. We, the Tax  office, knew nothing about this other income and in all probability would never have known. From memory, this happened again in the following year.<br />
J</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

